Take Away and Lesson Objectives
My Learning Objectives and Course
Take-Away’s
My learning objectives were to:
· Work in collaboration with my peers and demonstrate
my ability to use internal and socially negotiated dialogue to develop the ISD
Project. The social interaction required of this project was necessary to
develop a deeper understanding of professional development training and promote
critical thinking skills while working as a team.
· I had to learn to take social responsibility within
the group in order to fulfill my obligations and meet the team expectations,
while at the same time recognizing we were working as constructivist developers,
in which our own experiences and world-views factored into the outcome of this instructional
design project.
o
For example: I asked the team during our first
meeting to construct a mission statement, it helped us all aim for the same
target and define our goals. This was not required, but it helped as align our
personal expectations.
· My next learning objective was to learn how to
satisfy the lesson objectives and expectations, while also being aware and
intrapersonal about the influences of my peers contributing to the project.
· Motivation also planned a key role in this
collaborative project, in that, personal achievement, a combination of needs,
tendencies which led me to be voluntarily active had to be cared for in a
different way. Working with a team means letting down some expectations while
maintaining a willingness to participate.
Take Away’s:
· I self-identified with Regulation: This means I found
my purpose in the project early on and made instinct commitments to be active
and available for group collaboration.
o
I also had to learn to task delegate and step
back to allow my team the time needed to develop different areas of the lesson
· I point back to the constructivist learning
theory, which allowed each of us to bring our prior experiences and
perspectives to the project. I learned that we can all share equally regardless
of our strengths just as long as we worked together and held open communications
· We all agreed that technology integration in traditional
education must be taught as professional development to pre-service and
in-service educators, thus, we found our common goal, stated our mission
statement, which helped us recognize we were aiming for the same target, and we
established good momentum which continued through to the end.
· Finally, we made pro-active interventions to
support one another thought the development of the professional development
training. For example: Jason L. sent the majority of the emails to prompt the
team, this made organizing messages and comments easy to track.
References:
Brown, M.,
Hughes, H., Keppell, M., Hard, N., & Smith, L. (2015). Stories from
Students in Their First Semester of
Distance Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4).
doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.1647
Girvan, C.,
& Savage, T. (2010). Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual
worlds: A Communal Constructivism
case study. Retrieved June 12, 2017, from https://doi- org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.020
Goulimaris, D.
(2015). The relation between distance education students motivation and
satisfaction. Turkish Online
Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 13-28.
doi:10.17718/tojde.50678
Tung, L. C.
(2012). Proactive intervention strategies for improving online student
retention in a Malaysian distance
education institution. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching , 8(4),
312. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/1500353027?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=12085.
Comments
Post a Comment