Most Important Point 2 (annotated bibliography take-aways)
http://youtu.be/ZdlWaDYQzjE?hd=1
Motivational factors that
directly influence the retention rate of distance education students include
the thoughts, beliefs, goals and interactive relationships within our learning
environment (Hartnett, 2011).
Compared to
on-campus students, online students are more intrinsically motivated. Self-determination
is the intrinsic factor that sets many online students apart: these students do
not need outside incentives and incentives may even become counterproductive.
It is important to note that amotivated individuals who need external
motivation in this case study, struggled in the online learning environment.
External motivations include: Amotivation, this is the feeling of incompetence
or low self-efficacy. External regulation, which is motivation that is
responsive to threats, punishment or reward. Introjection, which is the need to
participate because of the expectation of others. Self-motivation includes: Identified
regulation, this is an activity which brings personal value or gain. Integration, which is the engagement in an
activity because of its significance to their sense of self (Hartnett, George,
Dron, 2011).
“The graduation rates for
the distance institutions appear to vary between 0.5 and 20% compared with more
than 80% for full-time education campus students in the United Kingdom” (Simpson,
2013, p. 107).
“61% of New Zealand’s virtual learners spend
at least 1 hour a week caring for a dependent, while only 37% of on-campus
students have that responsibility. Virtual students work on average 17.6 hours
a week at a regular job, compared to an on-campus student who works only 12.9 hours
a week, on average. First-year virtual students who work more than 12.5 hours a
week tend to consider dropping out, and those that work over 16 hours per week
become disengaged from their virtual classes” (Brown, Hughes, Keppell & Smith, 2015, p.
3).
Finally, a biblical
education deals with knowledge and truth as well as the student. Online
biblical education demands good, supportive, Christian constructs imbedded into
the academic pedagogy itself. Therefore, a constructivist learning theory
approach is required in order to address the issues of knowledge, truth, and the
student. The constructivist theory supports multiple intelligences. Constructivism
is the transformation of information using culturally relevant instructional
materials which enables the learner to be self-motivated, creative, exploratory,
question and critically think and conceptualize new strategies of learning. Biblical
education follows that we are to study Scripture as a requisite by God (2
Timothy 2:15). Likewise, Psalms 119 reminds us to take in scripture at a
personal level to inhibit sin in our lives (NIV). And our very food for mental
subsistence is the Word of God (Matthew 4:4).
Brown, M., Hughes, H., Keppell, M., Hard, N., & Smith, L. (2015).
Stories from students in their first
semester of distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(4)
Retrieved from http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/1754594578?accountid=12085
Hartnett,
M., George, A. S., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online
distance learning environments:
Complex, multifaceted and situation-dependent. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,
12(6), 20. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1030
Simpson, O.
(2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open
Learning: The Journal of Open,
Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119. doi:10.1080/02680513.2013.847363
Thorne, J. A. (2013). Biblical online education: contributions from constructivism.
Christian Education Journal, 10(1),
99-109. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
ReplyDeleteYour excitement in discussing the research you’ve done is motivating, Sharee. It certainly is interesting that data is showing high interaction and low retention rates in K-12 online programs. I wonder how much comes down to the instructional styles you mentioned. I know from my own experience, having a retentioneer can make a huge difference in overcoming challenges that are sure to arise. As a student who has to work with specific learning disabilities in reading and writing, the style of the instructor’s approach has made an even larger impact in the online setting, especially when additional soft factors arise. I certainly try to be a retentioneer in every way possible in my teaching, remembering how important several teachers with this approach have been for me throughout my education.
You also mention the importance of student motivation in their success in an online setting. Jones (2010) describes using the MUSIC model of Academic Motivation to support this. In this model, teachers focus on empowering (M) students, focusing on instruction and work that is useful (U), helping students to be successful (S), keeping lessons and projects interesting (I), and caring (C) for their students.
Reference:
Jones, B. D. (2010). An examination of motivation model components in face-to-face and online
instruction/ Estudio de componentes de un modelo de motivacion en la ensenanza presencial y online. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(3), 915+. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=vic_liberty&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA250999679&asid=5dfc72b6c5891c94359159b411ec6046